Kill Bill Actor, Michael Madsen, Arrested for California DUI

Comments

Michael Madsen Celebrity DUI

Michael Madsen, known for his roles in Quentin Tarantino movies among others, has been arrested for a DUI in Malibu, CA on Wednesday afternoon.

Police pulled the actor over after a witness reported a drunk driver on CA’s Pacific Coast Highway. Madsen’s BAC was reported to be over twice the legal limit. He was booked and later taken to the hospital.

The consequences for a DUI in CA include expensive fines, suspended driver’s license and even jail time. Oftentimes, many people can opt for alcohol treatment and education as opposed to jail time. Additionally, many CA drivers who have been arrested for a DUI also install an ignition interlock device so they can keep driving while still carrying out their sentence. If you have been arrested for a California DUI, contact an attorney today!

More DUI Offenders Using Ignition Interlocks

Comments
JournalStar.com reported today that in the state of Nebraska, more DUI offenders have been installing ignition interlock devices as a form of punishment for their drunk driving conviction. Many people across the United States have been opting to use ignition interlocks as it allows them to carry out their DUI sentence while still continuing to drive.

If you have been convicted of a DUI, you should strongly consider installing an ignition interlock. If you were to drive on a suspended license, you can get in so much trouble if you were to get caught again. However, not driving at all may not be an option for people who have jobs and other responsibilities and can’t rely on public transportation. This is why many DUI offenders have opted to install an ignition interlock because gives you the freedom to drive your car while still taking care of the penalties for your DUI offense.

An ignition interlock is installed into your car in the ignition column. In order to start your car, you must blow or exhale into the device. If the device detects alcohol on your breath, the ignition interlock will prevent your car from starting. Additionally, it will record the results and send them to the court if you are required to be monitored. Furthermore, you may be required to take rolling retests while on the road.

People have varying opinions on ignition interlocks, but on the whole many source report that the level of DUI recidivism has decreased in many states that have a required ignition interlock law. If you need to keep driving after your DUI, you should certainly inquire about installing an ignition interlock. Your DUI attorney can certainly help with this process. Additionally, you can also visit Smart Start’s website. Smart Start is a leading manufacturer of ignition interlock devices.

New Ignition Interlock Law in VA

Comments

Attention drivers in Virginia! If you get convicted of a DUI, even if it’s your first and only offense, you will be required to install an ignition interlock.

House Bill 279 and Senate Bill 378 were signed into law, which will require all first-time offenders to operate their vehicles with an ignition interlock if they have a restricted driver’s license.

An ignition interlock is a device that you install into your car. In order to start your car, you must blow into the device. If the ignition interlock detects any trace of alcohol, your vehicle will not start and the authorities could be notified. Additionally, the interlock will require you to take rolling retests while you are on the road.

You must go to a qualified maintenance shop to install an ignition interlock and you must also get the device calibrated monthly. It should also be noted that these maintenance costs come out of your pocket.

Having an ignition interlock is just one requirement of a Virginia DUI. This is why it is so important to hire an experienced VA DUI attorney to fight your charges to get them reduced or dropped altogether. Find an experienced VA DUI attorney today.

If you have been convicted of a DUI and need to install an ignition interlock, visit ignitioninterlock.com.

Marshawn Lynch Arrested for DUI in California

Comments

Seattle Seahaws running back Marshawn Lynch has been arrested for a DUI in California this past Saturday morning.

A highway patrol officer responded to a driver weaving through lanes on the Interstate 880 near Oakland. Lynch took a BAC test and his blood alcohol level was recorded as over the limit but no exact number was released.

The punishments for a California DUI include expensive fines, loss of driver’s license and possible jail time.

Additionally, a California DUI offender may also be required to install an ignition interlock device. An ignition interlock device allows DUI offenders to continue to drive while carrying out their sentence. The device is installed into a car and a driver needs to breathe into the device in order to start their car. If the device detects alcohol on a person’s breath the vehicle will not start.

If you have been arrested for a DUI in California, contact an attorney right away. You can protect your rights and continue to drive with quality legal defense.

Possible New Ignition Interlock Law in Virginia

Comments

Virginia may become another state that will require first time DUI offenders to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicles. Senate Bill 378 is currently being sponsored by Democratic Senator Don McEachin. It has the support of the Virginia chapter of MADD, as well as AAA- Mid-Atlantic.

Senate Bill 378 also hopes to add a provision that prohibits passenger vehicles that transport 15 or more people to be operated by Virginia DUI offenders.

An ignition interlock is a device that is installed in a driver’s car that prevents the bar from starting if it detects alcohol in a person’s system. An ignition interlock user has to blow or hum into device in order to start their vehicle. For more information on ignition interlock devices, please visit Ignitioninterlock.com.

If you have been arrested for a DUI in Virginia, there are experienced VA DUI attorneys waiting to hear from you. Contact a DUI attorney in Virginia today.

What is An Ignition Interlock?

Posted on by
Comments

If you have been arrested for a DUI, you may need to install an ignition interlock in your car as part of your punishment.

An ignition interlock is installed in the steering column of your car. In order to start your car, you must blow into the device and if the device detects alcohol, your car will not start. Additionally, you will be required to take rolling re-tests while on the road. The device itself looks no bigger than a cellphone.

It is an offense to tamper with the device or get someone else to blow in the interlock for you. In fact, many interlocks will soon come with a camera to ensure the correct person is utilizing the device. Furthermore, if you fail to install the device and get pulled over again, you can find yourself in a serious amount of trouble.

While many people find interlocks to be a bit of a nuisance when they’re on the go, at the end of the day, they are lucky to be able to drive. Not being able to drive tends to be a bigger hassle. With an ignition interlock, you can fulfill your sentence and learn to be more responsible on the road while still being able to carry on with your life.

A company that makes ignition interlocks, Smart Start, has just launched a few new state-based ignition interlock sites. If you live in Oregon, California, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut or Rhode Island, be sure to check out how you can find an interlock in your state and the specificities of your states’ interlock laws.

Leandra's Law 101 with Attorney Jeffrey J. Jowdy

Posted on by
Comments

Leandra’s law goes into effect in New York within a few days and I know many New York drivers feel in the dark about the new law and how it will affect them. The law will now make it a felony to drive drunk with a minor in the car as well as require anyone with a DWI offense to install an ignition interlock device.

With any new law, there are certain complexities that arise. To provide some insight, we have New York and Connecticut attorney Jeffrey J. Jowdy to explain how he feels about the law and how it can affect you.

RK: Have any of your clients been required to use ignition interlocks before? How did they react?

JJ: I have had a number of clients who have had to install ignition interlocks on their motor vehicles. After the initial shock my clients have come to accept the device as necessary for being able to maintain the ability to transport themselves without relying upon others or public transportation.

Initially the cost was a very large factor in how they reacted, but since costs of the devices and the monitoring services that issue is not as severe as it was a couple of years ago.

I have had clients with pending cases install the device as a way to improve their cases while they were pending. I have found this to be a useful tool in negotiating pleas.

Unfortunately however, the Departments of Motor Vehicles that we work with are still having difficulties in issuing conditional licenses that require ignition interlock devices. I am sure that when the new law goes into effect next month those difficulties will decrease.

RK: How do you think Leandra’s law will affect your cases in the future?

JJ: There will be a substantial affect on any case involving minor passengers. In the past cases like this were dealt with using risk of injury to minor type penal laws. Now that there is legislation specific to these cases that creates a felony for any offender, it will make cases more likely to go to trial and severely limit plea negotiations.

Anytime a new “crime” is created by the legislature, it is significant.

RK: Do you feel Leandra’s law is fair or do you find it too harsh?

JJ: I understand the position of the legislature in cases such as this and do believe that legislation specific to DWI charges involving minor passengers was needed. I think that making the charge a felony regardless of other extenuating circumstances is too harsh.

Anytime new legislation like this is created I often wish that it is done with varying degrees within the offense itself. I believe that there should be accelerated penalties for those who commit this offense with any prior DUI/DWI conviction on their record and that there should be more flexibility in dealing with First Time DWI/DUI offenders who find themselves charged with violating Leandra’s Law.

RK: What do you think the most important information NY drivers should know about Leandra’s law?

JJ: Obviously, the most important element of the law is that it is a felony to drive with a BAC over .08 with a passenger under 15 years old or younger.

.08% BAC is not a very high threshold and the fact that mere operation is now a felony, NY drivers should be even more mindful of their alcohol intake when they know that they will be transporting minors.

RK: Do you think Connecticut will follow in the same fashion as other states and update their ignition interlock law to require anyone with a DUI offense to have one?

JJ: At this time I am not aware of any plans for the State of Connecticut to update their DUI legislation to include ignition interlock devices.

The way Connecticut has set up its DUI laws does make for an easy transition should they wish to make an ignition interlock device mandatory however.

For first offenders, the Law requires that the offender’s Connecticut License or their Privilege to drive in Connecticut be suspended for a period of one year. Any requirement for an ignition interlock device can accompany this suspension. Moreover, since people who plead to DUI offenses in Connecticut usually have a prior arrest for DUI, legislation such as this might provide offenders with an ability to drive when it may not have existed previously.

For more information on Jeffrey Jowdy and state DWI laws, you can visit his New York page or his Connecticut page.

The Smart Start of New York website  has useful information and can help you find an ignition interlock in New York.

Ignition Interlocks 101

Posted on by
1

Attention Californians!

Posted on by
Comments

There is a law going into effect today that requires anyone with a DUI conviction to install an ignition interlock in their car.

Did you know that over 200,000 Californians get a DUI a year? Therefore, this new law is going to affect a lot of drivers. If you have been arrested recently, this law will likely affect you, too.

An interlock is installed into the steering column of your car. It looks no bigger than a cellphone. In order to start your car, you must breathe into the interlock. If it detects alcohol on your breath, your car will not start.

If you are interested in more information, I would check out the Smart Start of California website. It has a lot of details about interlock technology and a comprehensive analysis of the new CA ignition interlock law.

Photo of an ignition interlock.

Photo of an ignition interlock.

Many CA Residents Continue to Drive During License Suspension

Posted on by
Comments Off

In many DUI arrests, there are frequent cases of the driver operating a vehicle with a suspended license. We know that there are many repeat offenders, but in California the number of people who drive with a suspended license is quite immense.

According to the Ventura County Star, 180,000 Californians currently have their license suspended. An estimated 70,000 of those people continue to drive.

Why does this happen? Why do so many drivers believe they can slip through the cracks of the legal system?

According to California state law, driving on a suspended license is only a misdemeanor. Therefore, it takes a low priority in comparison to other crimes. Police do not do as many sweeps to monitor if people are driving illegally.

Above all, people (especially in California) need to drive to get to work and take care of other responsibilities. With California’s new ignition interlock law beginning its testing phase in July, we could see a decrease in those numbers. Time can only tell.

Department of Transportation Teams up with DADSS

Posted on by
Comments Off

Ray LaHood, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, announced on his blog today that the National Traffic Safety Association along with the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety have created a partnership with an alcohol detection research program known as Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety, or DADSS.

According to their website, DADSS aims to “research, develop, and demonstrate non-invasive in-vehicle alcohol detection technologies that can very quickly and accurately measure a driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BACs).” DADSS wants to avoid the use of ignition interlocks and create a device that would be used by society as a whole – not just convicted drunk drivers.

LaHood considers DADSS’ research to be a huge undertaking. After all, this organization is trying to create technologies to prevent drunk driving without being obtrusive to a person’s daily life. As of now, three companies are developing prototypes to be tested at Harvard Medical School.

If DADSS does create a device that is used by most drivers in the future, what kind of changes will we see to DUI laws? Will they be more lenient? Or could they become harsher than ever?

Advancing Interlock Bills in Multiple States

Posted on by
Comments Off

At the end of last week, Vermont and Tennessee both saw advances their proposed ignition interlock bills.

The Vermont House of Representatives approved Representative Eldred French’s ignition interlock bill. Not only will this proposed law reduce fatalities on the road, offenders who opt for an ignition interlock could possibly pay less in civil fines and see reductions in their license suspension.

In Tennessee, Representative Tom Shipley’s ignition interlock bill gained approval from the House Budget Subcommittee. Shipley’s bill beat out a competing bill by Representative Henry Fincher, despite Fincher’s bill being supported by the TN chapter of MADD.

[Sources: Times Argus and Timesnews.net]

PA Bill to Avoid Loophole

Posted on by
Comments Off

I reported last week about a legal loophole that allowed for a DUI offender not to be convicted for a second time since her first conviction had not happened yet. Apparently, this is an issue in many states.

This week, PA representative Seth Grove’s bill was approved by a state House of Representatives Committee. The bill allows people arrested for a second DUI to be considered repeat offenders even if they have yet to receive their first conviction.

There are many supporters of this bill, including the PA chapter of MADD. Ultimately, it will keep roads safer and make people more accountable for their actions.

The bill has yet to be approved by the PA House and Senate. Following the possible approval, the bill will be sent to Governor Ed Rendell.

[Source: York Dispatch]

M.A.D.D. Oversight in Nevada

Comments Off

Last year, the Nevada traffic safety office gave M.A.D.D. a $20,000 grant to educate judges and prosecutors about ignition interlock devices. However, the information M.A.D.D. shared was only in regards to first and second DUI offenses and not DUI felonies.

M.A.D.D. representative Keely Hedderman never spoke with judges or prosecutors about the law that requires DUI offenders to have an ignition interlock device for three years if they have killed or injured someone. She was only looking at first and second offenses and not felonies.

Because of this oversight, Nevada did not renew the grant. M.A.D.D. was unaware of this oversight, as well.

Do you think Hedderman was still being effective with just informing judges about first and second DUI offenses? What do you think this oversight means for M.A.D.D. and the reputation of Nevada’s DUI enforcement?

[Source: The Reno-Gazette Journal]

Prospective Harsher Penalties for Repeat DUI Offenders in Colorado

Comments Off

This past Friday, Colorado’s House passed a bill that would create harsher penalties for repeat DUI offenders.

Sponsored by Representative Claire Levy, House Bill 1347 includes a minimum prison sentence of ten days after a second DUI or DWI. For a third DUI, the offender faces 60 days minimum in prison.

The bill also includes a provision that will now require judges to issue ignition interlock devices, along with the offender being required to make periodic court visits and allow government monitoring of their drug and alcohol usage.

[Source: State Bill Colorado]

Is Minnesota Lagging Behind the Rest of the Country When it Comes to DUI Laws?

Posted on by
Comments Off

In an article in the Star Tribune, writer Richard Meryhew looks at Minnesota’s state drunk driving laws versus other state laws and finds that Minnesota is very behind the curve.

In the state of Nevada, there was a case where a drunk driver who killed a bystander received ten years in prison. In a similar case in Minnesota, the driver received only one year in prison.

Rarely are DUIs considered a felony in Minnesota, even for repeated offenders. Only if a person is killed can a DUI offender be convicted of a felony, as past rulings have indicated.

Unlike many of other states, Minnesota does not have sobriety checkpoints. In fact, in 1994 the state Supreme Court ruled sobriety checkpoints unconstitutional. Minnesota uses saturation patrols, which Meryhew claims are very ineffective.

Many states issue worse penalties for drivers who have a Blood Alcohol Level of .15 or above at the time of arrest. Minnesota issues these penalties if a person’s BAC is 0.20 or above. Some of the penalties other states issue include requiring drivers to use an ignition interlock device. A proposal by Minnesota’s governor Tim Pawlenty to require ignition interlock devices is still being debated in committee.

Why isn’t Minnesota influenced by the drunk driving laws of other states? If Minnesota were to toughen its laws, what consequences do you think will occur?

Update: Maybe an ignition interlock bill is closer than we think, according to this article.

New Arguments Against Harsher Maryland Drunk Driving Laws

Posted on by
Comments Off

Chairman of a Maryland House Panel, Joseph F. Vallario, has found new evidence to help him fight his case against Maryland’s tougher DUI laws. Maryland has taken centerstage in the world of DUI laws, as the prospective rulings have caused a much heated debate.

The prospective bill would require first-time DUI offenders to have an ignition interlock device, no matter what their BAC level was at the time of arrest. Vallario and his proponents have argued that this is unfair to first-time DUI offenders who are barely above the legal limit and have responsibly paid for their crime. (The legal limit is .08 in the state of Maryland.) Vallario has been fighting to have the law state that ignition interlocks should be required to first-time offenders who have a BAC of .15 or above.

As the hearings come to a close, Vallario has found more evidence to strengthen his objections. First is a study by the Wine Spirits and Wholesalers of America that states that the average blood alcohol level for most fatal accidents is .18. The second piece of evidence is the fact that only 11 states require ignition interlocks after the first DUI no matter what the BAC level, whereas 27 states issue ignition interlocks to offenders with .15 or above. These arguments, along with arguments from the License Beverage Distributors and Maryland defense lawyers, seem to be the key to victory, according to Vallario.

Additional Details in the New MD Ruling

Comments Off

Maryland’s DUI Laws have been the center of attention for many citizens. Recently, Maryland has become another state to require courts to issue an ignition interlock after a first DUI offense.

According to the “Getting There” column in the Baltimore Sun, the senate quickly passed the ignition interlock bill. However, the House Judiciary Committee is expected to pass this bill with adjustments. Originally, the bill stated that if a person has a BAC level of 0.08 or above, they would need an ignition interlock in order to drive. However, the House Judiciary Committee is attempting to amend the bill by requiring ignition interlocks only for perpetrators who have an extremely high BAC level.

Although this is most likely to outrage members of MADD and other proponents, columnist Michael Dresser says that the House Judiciary Committee had their reasoning. “[The] General Assembly can always come back and strengthen the law but…it wouldn’t ever have the option of dialing it back – even if it proved unworkable.”

For additional information on MD DUI Laws or if you are in Maryland and need help with your DUI case, contact an attorney today.

Maryland Senate Approves Ignition Interlock Device

Posted on by
Comments Off

The Maryland Senate has approved a bill to issue an ignition interlock device to a first time DUI offender. This is only a preliminary approval and WBAITV.com reports that the House Judiciary committee has yet to bring up the bill, but the Senate will most likely pass it on Thursday, March 25th.

Like other states, Maryland is issuing ignition interlock devices after hearing of some shocking statistics. A third of Maryland drunk drivers continue to drive after their license is suspended. Furthermore, many first time DUI offenders have admitted to driving drunk numerous times before their arrest.

The American Beverage Institute has objected to this ruling. They claim that issuing the interlocks after one offense is too harsh of a punishment. However, Maryland lawmakers insist that this measure will prevent a lot of drunk-driving deaths on Maryland’s highways. If you’re based in Maryland and need help with a current DUI, contact attorney Andrew D. Alpert today.

Nevada resurrects Advisory Coalition on Impaired Driving

Posted on by
Comments Off

After a series of communication issues with handling drunk driving cases, Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto has decided to bring back the Advisory Coalition on Impaired Driving. The coalition had not been meeting much in recent years, but is now back in full force after the Reno Gazette-Journal reported problems of Nevada handling drunk driving cases.

Some of the issues in the Reno Gazette-Journal included judges not following the law requiring them to issue interlock devices to people convicted of a DUI. The journal also reported the DMV giving licenses to offenders before their suspension deadline.

Now that it is reinstated, Special Deputy Attorney General Brett Kandt says he hopes the coalition can include more key members such as representatives from the courts, DMV, DOC, and Parole and Probation. With this, he hopes to dramatically reduce the number of drunk drivers in Nevada. If you are dealing with a DUI arrest in the state of Nevada, a DUI attorney is here to help.